From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> To: broonie@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, andi.shyti@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, semen.protsenko@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre.draszik@linaro.org, peter.griffin@linaro.org, kernel-team@android.com, willmcvicker@google.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] spi: s3c64xx: allow full FIFO masks Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:05:46 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240216070555.2483977-4-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240216070555.2483977-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> The driver is wrong because is using partial register field masks for the SPI_STATUS.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL register fields. We see s3c64xx_spi_port_config.fifo_lvl_mask with different values for different instances of the same IP. Take s5pv210_spi_port_config for example, it defines: .fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x1ff, 0x7F }, fifo_lvl_mask is used to determine the FIFO depth of the instance of the IP. In this case, the integrator uses a 256 bytes FIFO for the first SPI instance of the IP, and a 64 bytes FIFO for the second instance. While the first mask reflects the SPI_STATUS.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL register fields, the second one is two bits short. Using partial field masks is misleading and can hide problems of the driver's logic. Allow platforms to specify the full FIFO mask, regardless of the FIFO depth. Introduce {rx, tx}_fifomask to represent the SPI_STATUS.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL register fields. It's a shifted mask defining the field's length and position. We'll be able to deprecate the use of @rx_lvl_offset, as the shift value can be determined from the mask. The existing compatibles shall start using {rx, tx}_fifomask so that they use the full field mask and to avoid shifting the mask to position, and then shifting it back to zero in the {TX, RX}_FIFO_LVL macros. @rx_lvl_offset will be deprecated in a further patch, after we have the infrastructure to deprecate @fifo_lvl_mask as well. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> --- drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c index 6ff3b25b6feb..338ca3f03ea5 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ // Copyright (c) 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. // Jaswinder Singh <jassi.brar@samsung.com> +#include <linux/bitops.h> #include <linux/bits.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/delay.h> @@ -109,10 +110,10 @@ #define FIFO_LVL_MASK(i) ((i)->port_conf->fifo_lvl_mask[i->port_id]) #define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_DONE(v, i) (((v) & \ (1 << (i)->port_conf->tx_st_done)) ? 1 : 0) -#define TX_FIFO_LVL(v, i) (((v) >> S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_FIFO_LVL_SHIFT) & \ - FIFO_LVL_MASK(i)) -#define RX_FIFO_LVL(v, i) (((v) >> (i)->port_conf->rx_lvl_offset) & \ - FIFO_LVL_MASK(i)) +#define TX_FIFO_LVL(v, sdd) (((v) & (sdd)->tx_fifomask) >> \ + __ffs((sdd)->tx_fifomask)) +#define RX_FIFO_LVL(v, sdd) (((v) & (sdd)->rx_fifomask) >> \ + __ffs((sdd)->rx_fifomask)) #define FIFO_DEPTH(i) ((FIFO_LVL_MASK(i) >> 1) + 1) #define S3C64XX_SPI_MAX_TRAILCNT 0x3ff @@ -136,6 +137,10 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_dma_data { * struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config - SPI Controller hardware info * @fifo_lvl_mask: Bit-mask for {TX|RX}_FIFO_LVL bits in SPI_STATUS register. * @rx_lvl_offset: Bit offset of RX_FIFO_LVL bits in SPI_STATUS regiter. + * @rx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.RX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. + * @tx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.TX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. * @tx_st_done: Bit offset of TX_DONE bit in SPI_STATUS regiter. * @clk_div: Internal clock divider * @quirks: Bitmask of known quirks @@ -154,6 +159,8 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_dma_data { struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config { int fifo_lvl_mask[MAX_SPI_PORTS]; int rx_lvl_offset; + u32 rx_fifomask; + u32 tx_fifomask; int tx_st_done; int quirks; int clk_div; @@ -184,6 +191,10 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config { * @tx_dma: Local transmit DMA data (e.g. chan and direction) * @port_conf: Local SPI port configuration data * @port_id: Port identification number + * @rx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.RX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. + * @tx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.TX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. */ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data { void __iomem *regs; @@ -203,6 +214,8 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data { struct s3c64xx_spi_dma_data tx_dma; const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *port_conf; unsigned int port_id; + u32 rx_fifomask; + u32 tx_fifomask; }; static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd) @@ -1183,6 +1196,23 @@ static inline const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *s3c64xx_spi_get_port_config( return (const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *)platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data; } +static void s3c64xx_spi_set_fifomask(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd) +{ + const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *port_conf = sdd->port_conf; + + if (port_conf->rx_fifomask) + sdd->rx_fifomask = port_conf->rx_fifomask; + else + sdd->rx_fifomask = FIFO_LVL_MASK(sdd) << + port_conf->rx_lvl_offset; + + if (port_conf->tx_fifomask) + sdd->tx_fifomask = port_conf->tx_fifomask; + else + sdd->tx_fifomask = FIFO_LVL_MASK(sdd) << + S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_FIFO_LVL_SHIFT; +} + static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct resource *mem_res; @@ -1231,6 +1261,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) sdd->port_id = pdev->id; } + s3c64xx_spi_set_fifomask(sdd); + sdd->cur_bpw = 8; sdd->tx_dma.direction = DMA_MEM_TO_DEV; -- 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> To: broonie@kernel.org, robh@kernel.org, andi.shyti@kernel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org, semen.protsenko@linaro.org, conor+dt@kernel.org Cc: alim.akhtar@samsung.com, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, andre.draszik@linaro.org, peter.griffin@linaro.org, kernel-team@android.com, willmcvicker@google.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> Subject: [PATCH v3 03/12] spi: s3c64xx: allow full FIFO masks Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 07:05:46 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20240216070555.2483977-4-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> (raw) In-Reply-To: <20240216070555.2483977-1-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> The driver is wrong because is using partial register field masks for the SPI_STATUS.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL register fields. We see s3c64xx_spi_port_config.fifo_lvl_mask with different values for different instances of the same IP. Take s5pv210_spi_port_config for example, it defines: .fifo_lvl_mask = { 0x1ff, 0x7F }, fifo_lvl_mask is used to determine the FIFO depth of the instance of the IP. In this case, the integrator uses a 256 bytes FIFO for the first SPI instance of the IP, and a 64 bytes FIFO for the second instance. While the first mask reflects the SPI_STATUS.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL register fields, the second one is two bits short. Using partial field masks is misleading and can hide problems of the driver's logic. Allow platforms to specify the full FIFO mask, regardless of the FIFO depth. Introduce {rx, tx}_fifomask to represent the SPI_STATUS.{RX, TX}_FIFO_LVL register fields. It's a shifted mask defining the field's length and position. We'll be able to deprecate the use of @rx_lvl_offset, as the shift value can be determined from the mask. The existing compatibles shall start using {rx, tx}_fifomask so that they use the full field mask and to avoid shifting the mask to position, and then shifting it back to zero in the {TX, RX}_FIFO_LVL macros. @rx_lvl_offset will be deprecated in a further patch, after we have the infrastructure to deprecate @fifo_lvl_mask as well. No functional change intended. Signed-off-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org> --- drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c index 6ff3b25b6feb..338ca3f03ea5 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-s3c64xx.c @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ // Copyright (c) 2009 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. // Jaswinder Singh <jassi.brar@samsung.com> +#include <linux/bitops.h> #include <linux/bits.h> #include <linux/clk.h> #include <linux/delay.h> @@ -109,10 +110,10 @@ #define FIFO_LVL_MASK(i) ((i)->port_conf->fifo_lvl_mask[i->port_id]) #define S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_DONE(v, i) (((v) & \ (1 << (i)->port_conf->tx_st_done)) ? 1 : 0) -#define TX_FIFO_LVL(v, i) (((v) >> S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_FIFO_LVL_SHIFT) & \ - FIFO_LVL_MASK(i)) -#define RX_FIFO_LVL(v, i) (((v) >> (i)->port_conf->rx_lvl_offset) & \ - FIFO_LVL_MASK(i)) +#define TX_FIFO_LVL(v, sdd) (((v) & (sdd)->tx_fifomask) >> \ + __ffs((sdd)->tx_fifomask)) +#define RX_FIFO_LVL(v, sdd) (((v) & (sdd)->rx_fifomask) >> \ + __ffs((sdd)->rx_fifomask)) #define FIFO_DEPTH(i) ((FIFO_LVL_MASK(i) >> 1) + 1) #define S3C64XX_SPI_MAX_TRAILCNT 0x3ff @@ -136,6 +137,10 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_dma_data { * struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config - SPI Controller hardware info * @fifo_lvl_mask: Bit-mask for {TX|RX}_FIFO_LVL bits in SPI_STATUS register. * @rx_lvl_offset: Bit offset of RX_FIFO_LVL bits in SPI_STATUS regiter. + * @rx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.RX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. + * @tx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.TX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. * @tx_st_done: Bit offset of TX_DONE bit in SPI_STATUS regiter. * @clk_div: Internal clock divider * @quirks: Bitmask of known quirks @@ -154,6 +159,8 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_dma_data { struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config { int fifo_lvl_mask[MAX_SPI_PORTS]; int rx_lvl_offset; + u32 rx_fifomask; + u32 tx_fifomask; int tx_st_done; int quirks; int clk_div; @@ -184,6 +191,10 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config { * @tx_dma: Local transmit DMA data (e.g. chan and direction) * @port_conf: Local SPI port configuration data * @port_id: Port identification number + * @rx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.RX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. + * @tx_fifomask: SPI_STATUS.TX_FIFO_LVL mask. Shifted mask defining the field's + * length and position. */ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data { void __iomem *regs; @@ -203,6 +214,8 @@ struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data { struct s3c64xx_spi_dma_data tx_dma; const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *port_conf; unsigned int port_id; + u32 rx_fifomask; + u32 tx_fifomask; }; static void s3c64xx_flush_fifo(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd) @@ -1183,6 +1196,23 @@ static inline const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *s3c64xx_spi_get_port_config( return (const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *)platform_get_device_id(pdev)->driver_data; } +static void s3c64xx_spi_set_fifomask(struct s3c64xx_spi_driver_data *sdd) +{ + const struct s3c64xx_spi_port_config *port_conf = sdd->port_conf; + + if (port_conf->rx_fifomask) + sdd->rx_fifomask = port_conf->rx_fifomask; + else + sdd->rx_fifomask = FIFO_LVL_MASK(sdd) << + port_conf->rx_lvl_offset; + + if (port_conf->tx_fifomask) + sdd->tx_fifomask = port_conf->tx_fifomask; + else + sdd->tx_fifomask = FIFO_LVL_MASK(sdd) << + S3C64XX_SPI_ST_TX_FIFO_LVL_SHIFT; +} + static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) { struct resource *mem_res; @@ -1231,6 +1261,8 @@ static int s3c64xx_spi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) sdd->port_id = pdev->id; } + s3c64xx_spi_set_fifomask(sdd); + sdd->cur_bpw = 8; sdd->tx_dma.direction = DMA_MEM_TO_DEV; -- 2.44.0.rc0.258.g7320e95886-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-16 7:06 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-02-16 7:05 [PATCH v3 00/12] spi: s3c64xx: remove OF alias ID dependency Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 01/12] spi: dt-bindings: introduce FIFO depth properties Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 19:45 ` Conor Dooley 2024-02-16 19:45 ` Conor Dooley 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 02/12] spi: s3c64xx: define a magic value Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus [this message] 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 03/12] spi: s3c64xx: allow full FIFO masks Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 04/12] spi: s3c64xx: determine the fifo depth only once Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 05/12] spi: s3c64xx: retrieve the FIFO depth from the device tree Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 06/12] spi: s3c64xx: allow FIFO depth to be determined from the compatible Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 07/12] spi: s3c64xx: let the SPI core determine the bus number Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 08/12] spi: s3c64xx: introduce s3c64xx_spi_set_port_id() Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 09/12] spi: s3c64xx: get rid of the OF alias ID dependency Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 10/12] spi: s3c64xx: deprecate fifo_lvl_mask, rx_lvl_offset and port_id Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 11/12] spi: s3c64xx: switch gs101 to new port config data Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` [PATCH v3 12/12] spi: s3c64xx: switch exynos850 " Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-16 7:05 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-21 17:56 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-21 17:56 ` Tudor Ambarus 2024-02-24 23:59 ` Sam Protsenko 2024-02-24 23:59 ` Sam Protsenko 2024-03-06 14:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/12] spi: s3c64xx: remove OF alias ID dependency Mark Brown 2024-03-06 14:08 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20240216070555.2483977-4-tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \ --to=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \ --cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \ --cc=andi.shyti@kernel.org \ --cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \ --cc=broonie@kernel.org \ --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \ --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=kernel-team@android.com \ --cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \ --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \ --cc=robh@kernel.org \ --cc=semen.protsenko@linaro.org \ --cc=willmcvicker@google.com \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.